VALUE MODEL BENCHMARK

How much do Value Drivers estimates of B2B business cases vary?

Value Drivers of B2B Value Models have an average coefficient of variation of 80.8%, ranging from 36.9% to 123.09%. This shows that Value Drivers estimations tend to vary by a lot.

Sample: n=13 Enterprise Value Models
Updated: Q3 2026
Average Coefficient of Variation
80.8%
Median at 92.67%
Distribution Variance
36.90% → 123.09%
Executive Summary

Four key takeaways for business cases architects

  • •Value Drivers estimates vary by a lot inside a single Value Model.
  • •The usual coefficient of variation is between 46.22% and 108.86%.
  • •Having a high Coefficient of Variation (> 50%) means that Value Drivers are highly spread, with many probably insignificant.
  • •The Coefficient of Variation of Value Drivers paradox: while everyone want to have the full picture, lowest valued drivers are superfluous.

Value Drivers coefficient of variation Distribution

Min36.9%
Median: 92.67%
Max123.09%

The median Coefficient of Variation of Value Drivers is 92.67%, with the usual zone between 46.22% and 108.86%. Having a Coefficient of Variation above 50% means that Value Drivers are very different, with probably many Value Drivers being insignificant and creating noise.
Having a Coefficient of Variation above 100% means that Value Drivers vary drastically, dilluting the message and eroding trust.

Source: DecidUp Value Model Benchmark (2026, n=13).

Ranges represent 25th-75th percentiles.

Strategic Paradox

The Optimal Coefficient of Variation Paradox

1

Everyone want to have the full picture, but lowest valued drivers are superfluous.

B2B business cases tend to negociate massive value for the clients. Including low value Value Drivers will dilute the message and the attention.

It also creates a massive risk of being perceived as a "nice little commodity" instead of a real value-driving opportunity.

While your clients are looking for the full picture, they're actually expecting to have a focused map of the situation.
2

Coefficient of Variation too high, and you lose trust.

When you have massive Value Drivers living next to small Value Drivers, customers don't know what to believe.

Best case, they will get confused, and you will struggle to anchor the real value.

Worst case, they don't believe in the massive Value and will choose to focus on the smallest value because they're easier to believe.

Clients are not looking for the many small details, they are expecting a realistic estimation of their situation.
Field Playbook

Actionable Advice to Win More

Proven strategies to differentiate your value proposition and win more deals

Value Drivers

Value is too low?

Drop these Value Drivers. They don't drive enough value, and dillute the message.

Calibration

Value is too high?

Be more conservative in your estimations. It will build trust.

Data Integrity

Never generic.

Co-build the Value Drivers by having your lead enter their own metrics with you.

Stakeholder Buy-In

Never one-sided.

Do not do the exercise on your own, people give more trust in what they helped build.

THE CONSISTENCY CHECK

If drivers' values are too different, that's the first thing a decision maker will use against you.

Inconsistency reads as unreliability, even when the numbers are right.

FOR TEAMS WITH AN EXISTING MODEL

“Would my numbers trigger skepticism from my leads?”

Audit your model's consistency before it gets challenged internally.

FOR TEAMS STARTING FROM BENCHMARKS

“I have no method to standardize my estimates.”

Build a stable model your clients can trust.